Gamer.Site Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: b&l ray-ban usa diamond hard case

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ray-Ban - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray-Ban

    Ray-Ban is a brand of luxury sunglasses and eyeglasses created in 1936 by Bausch & Lomb. The brand is best known for its Wayfarer and Aviator lines of sunglasses. In 1999, Bausch & Lomb sold the brand to Italian eyewear conglomerate Luxottica Group for a reported $640 million.

  3. Ray-Ban Wayfarer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray-Ban_Wayfarer

    1950s singer Buddy Holly helped popularise Wayfarers. Ray-Ban Wayfarer sunglasses and eyeglasses have been manufactured by Ray-Ban since 1952. Made popular in the 1950s and 1960s by music and film icons such as Buddy Holly, Roy Orbison and James Dean, Wayfarers almost became discontinued in the 1970s, before a major resurgence was created in the 1980s through massive product placements.

  4. Aviator sunglasses - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviator_sunglasses

    Aviator sunglasses. F.W. Hunter, Army test pilot, with AN 6531 sunglasses (1942) Aviator sunglasses are a style of sunglasses that was developed by a group of American firms. The original Bausch & Lomb design is now commercially marketed as Ray-Ban Aviators, although other manufacturers also produce aviator-style sunglasses.

  5. The Wonderful Wizard of Oz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wonderful_Wizard_of_Oz

    The Wonderful Wizard of Oz at Wikisource. The Wonderful Wizard of Oz is a 1900 children's novel written by author L. Frank Baum and illustrated by W. W. Denslow. [1] It is the first novel in the Oz series of books. A Kansas farm girl named Dorothy ends up in the magical Land of Oz after she and her pet dog Toto are swept away from their home by ...

  6. Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reno_v._American_Civil...

    U.S. Const. amend. I; 47 U.S.C. § 223. Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, unanimously ruling that anti-indecency provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act violated the First Amendment 's guarantee of freedom of speech. [1]

  7. Employment Division v. Smith - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_Division_v._Smith

    U.S. Const. amend. Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), is a United States Supreme Court case that held that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual.

  1. Ads

    related to: b&l ray-ban usa diamond hard case